![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
If you have drywall as a predecessor to taping with an SS constraint, you cannnot have an FF predecessor as well- you would be to link start date to ther start AND finish of the predecessor.
I would suggest that if you know the amount of time between when drywall should be complete and tryingtaping should be complete, you use an FF+ predecessor. If you assume that taping should finish 1 day after walling finishes, the the predecessor for taping would be (drywall) FF+1d. This would link the two and ensure that taping i salways seen as finishing after the walling. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Predecessor name displayed in a text field
|
Leah | Project | 7 | 02-07-2014 03:26 PM |
| Linking predecessor twice | ketanco | Project | 1 | 04-06-2012 08:49 AM |
arrows remain between task bars, but predecessor info disappears from task info
|
Antares | Project | 1 | 12-14-2011 09:19 AM |
| MS Project 2007 Predecessor Macro | dmpyne | Project | 1 | 12-14-2011 08:46 AM |
New to project - Predecessor Question
|
geissap | Project | 1 | 01-20-2011 10:00 AM |