![]() |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The document looks quite normal to me. Since the endnote reference is in the table, not before the section break, I'd expect it to appear after the table - which is exactly where it is. In terms of the formatting display, Word depicts the endnote as being after the Section break but, as it should be, before any subsequent content.
Where the endnote appears in relation to the Section break is immaterial. What matters is that the output is correct. As with some other design decisions made by MS, this is just one of those aspects that is counter-intuitive. Given that the Section break defines the Section boundary, MS probably found it simpler to calculate the endnote positioning in relation to that rather than trying to insert the endnote between the text and Section break.
__________________
Cheers, Paul Edstein [Fmr MS MVP - Word] |
Tags |
word 2013 footnote table |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Table Border Behavior When Table Splits Across Pages | sarahmw0817 | Word | 1 | 01-22-2014 02:14 PM |
![]() |
l39linden | Word Tables | 5 | 10-04-2013 02:06 AM |
endnote and import reference from word to endnote | uncung | Word | 0 | 06-18-2011 08:09 AM |
![]() |
The Ink Monitor | Word Tables | 4 | 03-03-2011 09:17 AM |
![]() |
markg2 | Word Tables | 2 | 01-15-2010 05:22 PM |