![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Preview
![]() "Books and journals want (2a), not ((2)a)." But there is no (2a) in the text, so every time the reader sees a cross-reference, he or she has to reconstruct it. (2b) is even more work, because the two elements aren't on the same line … The (2)a you're trying for you is already easier to interpret; but I think I'd change the approach and go for something like: 2 strong past forms 2a. I painted last week. 2b. I applied last week. |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cross reference is bad. | Leffken | Word | 1 | 06-09-2016 03:12 PM |
![]() |
XTe | Word | 1 | 03-17-2016 07:41 PM |
cross-reference to field | eNGiNe | Word | 1 | 02-27-2015 07:46 PM |
![]() |
wmac | Word | 1 | 05-14-2013 08:54 PM |
![]() |
Jamal NUMAN | Word | 3 | 04-12-2011 06:47 AM |