![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting … first test with ^d assured me I had one field in the whole document, which I knew wasn't true: it displayed and highlighted one lone index marker from several releases ago, while leaving SEQ and SUBJECT fields unidentified.
Then I experimented with turning "Show field codes …" on, and voilą: 213 hits. With that principle established, I was able to abandon ^d and search successfully for SEQ fig Indirect end result, happy user <g> Thanks. |
![]() |
Tags |
field |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for Windows Search app with ability to search by content | gopher_everett | Office | 1 | 02-28-2013 09:23 PM |
Word 2010 - DOCX File with fields -> PDF with fields | senglory | Word | 2 | 03-27-2012 10:10 AM |
![]() |
joblo108 | Excel | 3 | 09-09-2011 04:23 AM |
Instant Search's "Display search results as I type when possible" with Exchange | lwc | Outlook | 0 | 06-01-2011 01:56 AM |
Search and Replace - Clear Search box | JostClan | Word | 1 | 05-04-2010 08:46 PM |