Macropod,
Thanks a million for your last post. I followed your instructions to the letter and the field code works like a charm. IT'S AMAZING! I am impressed with how it works on a 6 page test I conducted summarized below:

Page 1 displays page number: FP-1
Page 2 displays page number: NOTHING
Page 3 displays page number: FP-3
Page 4 displays page number: NOTHING
Page 5 displays page number: FP-5
Page 6 displays page number: NOTHING

My last question regarding this field code is whether this field code can be modified to account for the BLANK pages themselves as shown in the example below:

Page 1 displays page number: FP-1 (FP-2 Blank)
Page 2 displays page number: NOTHING
Page 3 displays page number: FP-3 (FP-4 Blank)
Page 4 displays page number: NOTHING
Page 5 displays page number: FP-5 (FP-6 Blank)
Page 6 displays page number: NOTHING

The Military standard requires the BLANK pages also be counted as shown in the example above. To do this, would require a field code that counts two separate page numbering streams. Is it possible for a single field code to handle two different page numbering streams but only allow ODD FP-# page numbers be picked up on the LIST OF FIGURES which follows the TABLE OF CONTENTS in the front of the manual?

In other words, the LIST OF FIGURES will be obligated to show in the Page Number Column page numbers that look like this:

Schematic A..........FP-1 (FP-2 Blank)
Schematic B..........FP-3 (FP-4 Blank)
Schematic C..........FP-5 (FP-6 Blank)

In reality the Military standard specifies the LIST OF FIGURES to look like this:

Schematic A..........FP-1
Schematic B..........FP-3
Schematic C..........FP-5

I am very curious to know what your opinion is regarding whether a single field code can handle two separate page numbering streams and at the same time only allow the ODD page numbers be included in the LIST OF FIGURES. If you feel up to it a final post that includes such a field code would be my final request in this thread. Thank you very much, I am very appreciative for what you have taught me so far. I'm glad you are so generous with what you know because making WORD 2007 conform to Military standards is very complicated.