My theory is that Outlook orders the "All Attendees" in the order that the invitees are entered in the same way that the order of "To:" addresses on an email to many recipients is the order that they were entered or selected.


One company I know of considered it bad email etiquette to NOT sort the recipients in the "To" field by the recipients order of importance. is this ego? Is it micro-management gone amok?



I wonder if this firm has similar etiquette guidelines for Outlook meetings?