![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The find-findnext was only a suggestion of something to look into.
Don't know if this is of any use or not. Here is what I did: added module2, altered the forms' Search and Extract procedure a little... it's commented. put a timer in your Find_Whole_Word_CIS1(x) macro. In it's original state, on my computer, that macro ran in 48 seconds (last input box to first msgbox). Adding Application.ScreenUpdating=False reduced the time to 9 seconds. Using .Find and .FindNext (in module2) the time to run was 3 seconds, but the macro is questionable, as the results didn't jive. The original macro found 2717 records. 60 of those weren't in the results of find/findnext. I can account for that being 'the' at the beginning of a sentence or first word inside brackets and not having a preceding space. The find/findnext macro found 3018 records. 361 of these aren't in the original results and I don't know what gives with that. The attached Comparison workbook contains only the results of the 2 macros, the discrepancies are highlighted. |
Tags |
case, search, whole word match |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to speed up macro | AC PORTA VIA | Excel | 3 | 10-30-2015 08:58 PM |
Excel formula required to speed up process of creating species rarefaction curves. Ecology! | Tim_F | Excel | 2 | 07-18-2014 04:56 AM |
![]() |
ptz | Word | 2 | 09-20-2012 06:37 AM |
![]() |
lucky67 | Office | 1 | 01-26-2012 09:20 PM |
![]() |
cadams | Office | 1 | 12-07-2010 10:01 AM |