![]() |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Joli, if there was a missing item in the middle, an empty cell, the End-up approach would only go that far. If you e.g.
Code:
dim c as range
for each c in range("AllAges")
etc.
But I'll admit the using the filter and deleting that way is likely to be far far faster than walking every item in the range one by one. On the other point, if you used the named range, there would be no hardcoded 4 in the code either. |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grouping table rows to prevent individual rows from breaking across pages
|
dennist77 | Word | 1 | 10-29-2013 11:39 PM |
Count rows and add blank rows accordingly
|
Hoochtheseal | Word VBA | 1 | 01-29-2013 09:23 PM |
rows in word?
|
j2b3 | Word Tables | 3 | 07-19-2012 03:59 PM |
merging rows and creating sub-rows
|
gib65 | Excel | 2 | 12-09-2011 02:09 PM |
How to remove blank rows from a specified range?
|
Learner7 | Excel | 1 | 04-19-2011 02:45 AM |