![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Joli, if there was a missing item in the middle, an empty cell, the End-up approach would only go that far. If you e.g.
Code:
dim c as range for each c in range("AllAges") etc. But I'll admit the using the filter and deleting that way is likely to be far far faster than walking every item in the range one by one. On the other point, if you used the named range, there would be no hardcoded 4 in the code either. |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
![]() |
dennist77 | Word | 1 | 10-29-2013 11:39 PM |
![]() |
Hoochtheseal | Word VBA | 1 | 01-29-2013 09:23 PM |
![]() |
j2b3 | Word Tables | 3 | 07-19-2012 03:59 PM |
![]() |
gib65 | Excel | 2 | 12-09-2011 02:09 PM |
![]() |
Learner7 | Excel | 1 | 04-19-2011 02:45 AM |