![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've inherited a document that uses SEQ fields to number figures and tables. Nothing frightening there, but as the document has evolved in different hands some hapless individuals have put numbering in by hand. I know about shading fields so I can spot them by eye, but is there any way to use Search to skip from field to field?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You can use:
Find = ^d
__________________
Cheers, Paul Edstein [Fmr MS MVP - Word] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting … first test with ^d assured me I had one field in the whole document, which I knew wasn't true: it displayed and highlighted one lone index marker from several releases ago, while leaving SEQ and SUBJECT fields unidentified.
Then I experimented with turning "Show field codes …" on, and voilą: 213 hits. With that principle established, I was able to abandon ^d and search successfully for SEQ fig Indirect end result, happy user <g> Thanks. |
![]() |
Tags |
field |
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looking for Windows Search app with ability to search by content | gopher_everett | Office | 1 | 02-28-2013 09:23 PM |
Word 2010 - DOCX File with fields -> PDF with fields | senglory | Word | 2 | 03-27-2012 10:10 AM |
![]() |
joblo108 | Excel | 3 | 09-09-2011 04:23 AM |
Instant Search's "Display search results as I type when possible" with Exchange | lwc | Outlook | 0 | 06-01-2011 01:56 AM |
Search and Replace - Clear Search box | JostClan | Word | 1 | 05-04-2010 08:46 PM |