#1
|
|||
|
|||
Difference between 16:9 Widescreen and 16:9 On-Screen Show?
Does anyone know why Microsoft offers both 16:9 Widescreen and 16:9 on-screen show? The difference is the measurement in inches. Widescreen is W13.333 x H7.5 whereas On-Screen Show is W10 x H5.63. But that difference actually doesn't mean anything, does it? Because once you go into Slideshow mode, both settings are 16:9 aspect ratio and would look exactly the same, and the actual inches don't really matter.
I don't understand why both options are there. What was the point of adding the 13.333 x 7.5 as an option (and now the default option)? Certainly I am missing something. Can anyone help me understand? If my presentations are being displayed on a 16:9 display that is in a corporate conference room (displays are probably 5+ years old, 16:9), I am not sure what to think about the difference. I assume there is some difference if you are copying content from a 4:3 standard and pasting into either of the above mentioned 16:9 aspect ratios. Is that the only thing to keep in mind here? I am struggling to think of a circumstance where this difference is important. Thanks! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Widescreen is the same height as 4:3 and this makes it easier to scale from one to the other.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Hi John, thank you for your reply. I guess what I am having trouble wrapping my tired brain around, is that the old 10x5.63 16:9 is the same width as 4:3. They are both 10inches wide. So we have two scenarios when scaling from 4:3 to 16:9: A. Scale to a size which is the same height (from 4:3 to Widescreen 16:9) B. Scale to a size which is the same width (from 4:3 to On-Screen Show 16:9) What makes scenario A easier than scenario B? Both scenarios involve some scaling, just a different kind of scaling. (Maybe I am just overthinking it, and need to let it go, and just go with it? I just like to understand why things are done a certain way, or why Microsoft recommends doing things a certain way) Anyway thanks again! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Not sure I really understand it but it is supposed to be easier to stretch width wise than squash height wise when going from 4:3 to 16:9 (The old default in 2010 to the new in 2013 on.)
Either way unless to use the change size controls it should be OK with either. |
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PP will not show on screen | tradedog | PowerPoint | 7 | 11-12-2013 04:24 AM |
how to get outlook to show alerts full screen | calversbuyuk | Outlook | 0 | 08-07-2013 08:26 AM |
SOME slides disappear on laptop screen but show on TV | dlsherman | PowerPoint | 0 | 10-31-2011 04:33 PM |
Calendar entries do not show on screen MS outlook 2003 on Win 7 | sandyr | Outlook | 0 | 08-21-2010 07:41 AM |
Show not filling screen, left to right | dougleax | PowerPoint | 2 | 07-14-2010 06:50 AM |