![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The most likely cause of the problem with the original field coding is that is unnecessarily nests some of the fields. Doing so may result in Word evaluating some of them mathematically. You also don't need the MERGEFORMAT switch. Thus:
{IF{ { MERGEFIELD School_address } }<> {REF Key \* MERGEFORMAT } "{IF{MERGESEQ}> 1 {QUOTE 12}"} { SET Key { { { MERGEFIELD School_address } } } } should only be: {IF{MERGEFIELD School_address}<> {REF Key} "{IF{MERGESEQ}> 1 {QUOTE 12}"} {SET Key {MERGEFIELD School_address}}
__________________
Cheers, Paul Edstein [Fmr MS MVP - Word] |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Condensing financial data
|
H28Sailor | Excel | 13 | 04-02-2017 12:00 AM |
Mailmerge Directory - Incomplete Data Appearing in Merge Output
|
Gwinnett | Mail Merge | 5 | 03-05-2017 02:24 PM |
Directory Mail Merge
|
IslandAC | Mail Merge | 1 | 09-09-2016 04:53 PM |
Help with using catalog in Directory merge
|
tarcher61 | Mail Merge | 15 | 03-30-2016 02:08 PM |
Word 2010 - directory mail merge - two separate group of data in one document
|
htsu | Mail Merge | 2 | 03-07-2016 03:10 PM |