Bruno: You really need to pay attention.
In post #1 the OP clearly said 75 random numbers, not 76.
My reply in post #6 clearly shows how to do that. Granted, I used a different set of boundary numbers, but that is not the point.
My reply to you in post #9 was aimed, not at producing random numbers, but at demonstrating the abject fallacy of your 'impossible!' assertion. The simple fact of the matter is that there is a very large number of possible solutions to the problem, with or without allowing for repeated numbers.
__________________
Cheers,
Paul Edstein
[Fmr MS MVP - Word]
|