View Single Post
 
Old 01-07-2024, 06:32 AM
p45cal's Avatar
p45cal p45cal is offline Windows 10 Office 2021
Expert
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 948
p45cal has a reputation beyond reputep45cal has a reputation beyond reputep45cal has a reputation beyond reputep45cal has a reputation beyond reputep45cal has a reputation beyond reputep45cal has a reputation beyond reputep45cal has a reputation beyond reputep45cal has a reputation beyond reputep45cal has a reputation beyond reputep45cal has a reputation beyond reputep45cal has a reputation beyond repute
Default

So par v udi was postponed until 8th April 2015, week 29 (row 290)

If you extend your calculations in columns Z and to the right, to row 290 or more, then change the 29 in cell D290 to 24, it goes a long way to putting things right.
Before you make that change, you'll notice also, that 11 fixtures were played for week 29; that's going to snarl things up.

This goes back to my msg#8 about what is a 'round' and how is it defined? At the moment, you've said it was league and week. Should it be something different?

However:
In your first message in this thread you said you wanted "to figure home and away teams' league position ahead of their match"

I see that in your expected results you seem to have included the ranks of the missing udi and par calculated from an earlier week/round's values in columns AN:AO. However, the values for those teams are for fewer matches played, so I think they're not comparable… but you may say different.

I think it could be possible to look at the most recent values (regardless of week) for all the teams playing in a given league and use those scores in columns AN:AO to rank them. This would make the formula even more complicated, and with your version of Excel, longer, to the point that it might be easier to have a user defined function (macro function) which would need vba code and for macros to be enabled and the file would become a .xlsm file. Acceptable?

A Power Query solution might also be possible (built in to Excel since version 2016) and would look neater.

I'll await comments on all the above before doing anything.
Reply With Quote