Hi Carnegie,
I'd have thought the macro would work even if the document had tracked changes - if tracked changes was on when it ran, the numbering might get even stranger, though, as lots of footnotes would become 'deleted' and 'inserted' as the code ran. Accepting the tracked changes would fix this.
If the macro didn't/doesn't work on a document without tracked changes, then there is some other 'issue' with the way the footnotes have been created. Without seeing the document, it's impossible to say.
__________________
Cheers,
Paul Edstein
[Fmr MS MVP - Word]
|